Disengagement of mature age people from the labour force

To address the economic challenges of the ageing population, recent Federal Governments in Australia have sought to promote increased participation of mature age people in the labour force.

Policy interventions to promote longer working lives have included incentives for superannuation and incentives for employers to hire older workers. Other policy interventions include increasing the eligibility for the Age Pension, from 65 to 67 years in 2023, with a proposed further increase announced in the 2014–15 Federal Budget pushing the eligibility age to 70 by 2035. 

It is timely to conduct an analysis to understand more about mature age Australians who are not employed. This analysis seeks to answer the following research questions:

What are the main reasons for mature age people ceasing employment, and which socio-economic groups of the population are most at risk of involuntarily ceasing employment? What are the financial outcomes of mature age people who leave the workforce before the age of 65, and what types of Government payments do they receive? What is the demand for and access to training among mature age people, in particular groups most at risk of early disengagement from the workforce?

Research methods

The data in this report is taken from the 2011 Census of Population and Housing, the 2008–09 Multipurpose Household Survey and the 2011–12 Barriers to Employment for Mature Age Australians Survey. Data is represented as basic frequencies and crosstabulations. Multivariate analyses in the form of binary and multinomial logistic regressions were employed to analyse specific variables.

Key Findings

Mature age employment and qualifications

People aged 50-69 years with a non-school qualification (i.e. a Certificate, Advanced Diploma or Diploma, Bachelor Degree, Graduate Diploma, Graduate Certificate Level or Postgraduate Degree) were more likely to be employed than those without a non-school qualification. The proportion of females aged 55–64 with a non-school qualification that were employed was 20 percentage points higher than females without a non-school qualification.

Reasons mature age people leave the workforce 

Illness and injury (30%) was the most common reason why non-employed people aged 50-69 years ceased their last job. A further 12% of people left their last job because they were retrenched, dismissed or there was no work available. Reaching retirement age was the reason why 23% of people left their last job and 8% of people left because of caring responsibilities. Manual workers and people without a high school qualification or a non-school qualification were most likely to have left their last job because they were retrenched, dismissed, there was no work available for them, or because of illness, injury or disability. Males were also more likely to have left their last job because of illness, injury or disability.

Predicted probabilities derived from a regression model revealed that a non-employed person aged 50–69, who did not have a non-school qualification and who were previously employed in a manual occupation, had a 52% likelihood to have ceased their last job because of illness, injury or disability. People in this group had a 14% likelihood to have ceased their last job because they were retrenched, dismissed or Productive Ageing Centre they left because there was no work available for them. In comparison, people who had both high school and non-school qualifications, and who previously had a non-manual job, had a 23% likelihood to have left their last job because of illness, injury or disability. People in this group had only a 6% likelihood to have been dismissed or to have left because there was no work available for them.

Financial outcomes

Of people who were aged 55–59 years, 88% whose last job ceased for health reasons had retired; 96% who had been retrenched had retired; and 83% who had left their last job for other reasons had retired. Most people who had been non-employed for at least 12 months relied on a government pension or allowance as their primary source of income (70% of non-employed people aged 50–54, 55% of those aged 55–59 and 57% of those aged 60–64). Twenty-nine per cent of non-employed people aged 50–64 received the Disability Support Pension (DSP), 5% received Newstart Allowance, and 5% received the Carer Payment. People whose last job was a manual occupation and those without non-school qualifications were most likely to receive the DSP.

Predicted probabilities derived from a regression model showed that non-employed males aged 50–64, who had not completed high school or who did not have a non-school qualification, whose last job was manual and who left their last job because of being retrenched, had a 55% likelihood to receive the DSP. This compared with a 32% likelihood of all non-employed people who were between 50 and 64 years old. Further, males who had a similar level of education, whose previous job was in a manual occupation and who left their last job for health reasons had a 74% likelihood to receive the DSP. Only 10% of the spouses or partners of non-employed males were employed in full-time work, with a further 8% in part-time work. For non-employed people whose main income was a government payment, only 10% had a spouse or partner who was receiving income from working. 

Demand for and access to training 

A majority of mature age workers thought that training would help them gain a promotion or do their job better. Mature age people who were non-employed thought it would help them find a job. This was especially the case for people without non-school qualifications, for those aged 45–54 and for females. Fifty-five per cent of people without non-school qualifications reported attending some training in the past five years compared with 81% who had finished high school and attained a non-school qualification.

People in manual occupations and working in manufacturing, construction or mining were also less likely than other workers to have attended training. A little more than one-third of people (37%) found training they wanted but couldn’t attend (i.e. had an unmet demand for training). People in manual occupations and without nonschool qualifications were least likely to have an unmet demand for training. The main reasons why people had an unmet demand for training were that the training wouldn’t fit in with other commitments (64%); that they couldn’t afford it (44%); and that the employer wouldn’t fund or allow them to attend (33%).


Appropriate training is vital for many mature age people to ensure that their skills are relevant and to increase their employability. There is much need for training to be targeted at higher risk groups, such as those with low qualifications or in manual occupations.

The training should be offered at different career stages before mature age people become disengaged from the workforce. Investments in training will help promote longer working lives in the future for mature age people.

To download the full report, please complete and submit the form below.

You are currently viewing part of this issue. Become a member or login to view the full issue.

Become a member

Create an account to Join today to access 50 Something and more!


Login using your member details.

Join us today

Share your voice and select the benefits that matter to you with a National Seniors membership.

Join now

google-site-verification: google77b3161d13728aea.html